 |
| Enjoy |
 |
NewsAgent-Mo
Mare
|
Join date: Dec 2010
Location: LONDON
|
| Posts: 396 |
|
 |
The adjective 'thick' was unnecessary!
|
|
|
|
|
|
tcollins
Mare
|
Join date: Jan 2010
Location: carrigaline
|
| Posts: 354 |
|
|
Well, Mr Anderson, perhaps now you will agree with my view that this forum is infected with bookie's lackeys trying to disrupt any genuine and worthwhile content.
They saw you as a danger and baited and insulted you into backing off. That is a great pity. I missed your latest good'un as I was away from my laptop for a couple of days but I would certainly trust any info or analysis you posted and have my usual modest bet on it.
It's indeed a pity you have been bullied off this otherwise excellent site. Should you ever find a system of passing on your views only to us genuine fans you know my email address.
Good luck whatever you decide.
Tom C.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
agilmore
Dark Horse
|
Join date: May 2011
Location: NEWTON AYCLIFFE
|
| Posts: 2954 |
|
|
It is certainly no bad thing to highlight the results of contributors who post selections; if the results are positive then I am sure the tipsters will be glad of the additional publicity. If selections prove unsuccessful then it might be appropriate to illustrate for the benefit of the forum members who do not view every posting. As for the policing of the system the admin team have already suggested somewhere on the forum that criticism can be offered against individual views providing it doesn't lead to personal comments or attacks about the individual. I don't know if people receive "inside information" - I certainly don't but ask yourselves this - if you were to genuinely receive or have access to some "real" information why would you post on a public forum - apart from being contrary to what you may or may not have been told by the source - which I assume would be "to keep it quiet and to yourself" - it simply doesn't make sense. There are many poor stable staff so if they cannot win when they look after the horse how can you expect to be party to privileged information!! - people need to get real
|
|
|
| It will get better in the end but if it isn't better then its not the end |
|
|
|
|
|
moreilly
Mare
|
Join date: Aug 2010
Location: ASHFORD
|
| Posts: 359 |
|
|
Was merely stating your thoughts of my persona from your earlier post that was picked up by others and you mention defeat....... It is not a battle sir as my thoughts on your views remain the same as when I read your first negative post earlier tonight and then after reading your past posts merely cemented my thoughts. Sleep well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
jconnolly2
Filly
|
Join date: May 2011
Location: Balbriggan
|
| Posts: 142 |
|
|
As I said earlier moreilly. Ignore him. That's the best solution. Topic closed I wish/hope
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gin'n'Tonic
Stud
|
Join date: Apr 2012
Location: WEST MALLING
|
| Posts: 550 |
|
|
Originally posted by agilmore
"It is certainly no bad thing to highlight the results of contributors who post selections; if the results are positive then I am sure the tipsters will be glad of the additional publicity. If selections prove unsuccessful then it might be appropriate to illustrate for the benefit of the forum members who do not view every posting. As for the policing of the system the admin team have already suggested somewhere on the forum that criticism can be offered against individual views providing it doesn't lead to personal comments or attacks about the individual. I don't know if people receive "inside information" - I certainly don't but ask yourselves this - if you were to genuinely receive or have access to some "real" information why would you post on a public forum - apart from being contrary to what you may or may not have been told by the source - which I assume would be "to keep it quiet and to yourself" - it simply doesn't make sense. There are many poor stable staff so if they cannot win when they look after the horse how can you expect to be party to privileged information!! - people need to get real"
Thought it was worth replying to this as I have to say, I have often wondered the same.
That said, I think too much is said about 'information' or worried about where its come from etc. In this case, the truth is that Manderson's selections, whether they be info, informed assumptions (ie more informed than the common man can hope to be) or just selections based on good racing knowledge and insight, I don't really care since the results speak for themselves.
I do okay from my own selections - not amazingly but I think I've had a bit of luck and manage to make a few quid here and there. Manderson's tips though on a level stake system, have enabled me to make more money and I just don't see what anyone's complaint can be.
Yes there are losers, but lets look at 2 things:
1) Your post - is there really such a thing as real 'info' in the public domain?
2) Even info horses can fail. Going may not suit, jockey may ride poorly, horse may fall, horse may not have read the script, other horse may run the race of its life.
Based on these 2 things and the fact we are all realistic gamblers, how can anyone expect 100% even with 'info'?
Manderson was a positive on this forum - and enabled others to make money. Regardless of how he made his selections, a lot of people will now feel that they are losing out through not receiving the benefit of his info/insight, and that is not a good thing.
|
|
|
He not busy being born, is busy dying.
All I can do is be me, whoever that is. |
|
|
|
|
 |
S Dickson
Novice
|
Join date: Apr 2010
Location: BANGOR
|
| Posts: 45 |
|
|
Hi M Anderson well done with yesday result wasnt on as i was away for few days break..Hope to hear from you again in the near future..Its typical of this site get sum1 like yourself who give ppl good info then the 1st time its down they get treated like S**T..Cant understand the hatters on here as they never complain when there getting winning info always when the info gets beat..THATS THE NAME OF THE GAME GAMBLING
|
|
|
IF YOUR ERE AFTER WHAT AM ERE AFTER WERE BOTH ERE AFTER THE SAME!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
mman
Mare
|
Join date: Aug 2008
Location: LEIGHTON BUZZARD
|
| Posts: 218 |
|
|
Hi mate
And thankyou for your tips very well done I'm still in profit.
For 1 I don't blame you for not wanting to post anymore you will always get sausages on any forum.who want to belittle people.
I get the feeling that manderson5 takes these digs in a bad way it's not the opinion of 95% of us just the 5% of complete tools who either lost there giros by not following correctly.or are just vindictive malicious people.if amandwrson5 feels distressed by these divs he should rightly leave the forum.hopefully he will get his tips out to us another way! But if not good luck for the future mate and make sure you keep bashing the bookies.
Thanks
Mman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
GG.COM
GG.COM Admin
|
Join date: Jul 2001
Location: Northampton
|
| Posts: 1724 |
|
|
I think it is fair to say this thread has now run whatever course it was set out to.
As always, do remember that you're responsible for what you write here and personal attacks of a kind which are outside or below what one could describe as "banter" will not be tolerated.
When you click on Horse Racing Tips, it should be to share or observe horse tips- that is what we're here for.
Cheers
GG.Com
|
|
|
GG.COM
http://www.gg.com |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
£200 Free Bet
£25 Free Bet
£50 Free Bet
£10 Free Bet
£250 in Free Bets
£50 Free Bet
£100 Free Bet
£35 Free Bet
£88 Free Bet
£25 Free Bet
Bet £10 Get £30
